10:00
STAT 375 UC Berkeley
In your groups, take turns sharing:
10:00
Peer Instruction (Mazur, 1997)
Context: provide new model/language for familiar phenomenon.
Question: calibrated to be in the sweet spot of challenging but not too challenging.
Poll (1 min): students wrestle individually, commit to answer, prepare to explain.
Discuss (4 min): explaining can air misunderstanding, peers can be good teachers.
Re-poll (30 sec) : groups commits to answer, prepares to explain, feedback to instructor.
Share: air common misunderstandings.
Explain: resolve tension in conflicting answers.
Peer Instruction (Mazur, 1997)
Think-Pair-Share
Think: give students ~1 minute to consider the question and articulate their thinking (usually in writing).
Pair: students take turns explaining their thinking to a peer.
Share: pairs share their thinking with the class to air correct and incorrect conceptions.
Consider a specific aspect of or incident in your working relationship with your teaching team that has gone poorly or could be improved
Think: give students ~1 minute to consider the question and articulate their thinking (usually in writing).
Pair: students take turns explaining their thinking to a peer.
Share: pairs share their thinking with the class to air correct and incorrect conceptions.
How can this fail?
Peer Instruction (Mazur, 1997)
Think-pair-share
Purposeful pause
Instructor pauses every ~15 minutes during lecture and asks students to:
Take a couple of minutes to summarize in writing what they just learned and jot down any questions or confusions or.
Turn to a neighbor and discuss and rework their notes in pairs, including identifying questions or confusions.
Peer Instruction (Mazur, 1997)
Think-pair-share
Purposeful pause
Quick writes
Instructor poses a prompt that students respond to in writing for ~5 minutes or less.
prompt might be a conceptual question, or metacognitive/reflective(link is external) question, including asking students to identify the most important takeaway or a point of confusion.
can be implemented at many points during a lecture, combined with small- or large-group discussion, and may be collected to inform future class sessions
if graded, points are typically awarded for completion/participation.
Most discussion sections at Cal take some version of the form:
As a GSI and as a student, please think through at least two ways that you’ve seen step 2 fail. Enter your response on the padlet linked at bit.ly/3pxnBeQ
.
In groups of 4, discuss each of the failure modes and brainstorm a 2 - 5 methods that can be used to avoid them or short-circuit them when they occur. Designate one of your group members to take notes and another as the spokesperson.
08:00
You are tasked with teaching someone else how to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwhich
How would you start? What would you do first?
01:00
Please contribute your answer at pollev.com/andrewbray088
.
Evan-Amos, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Think about the last class session you taught.
Think about the last class session you taught.
05:00
05:00
This is your chance to practice rebuilding your lesson using this particular planning structure.
In pairs, work to fill out both pages to redesign one person’s lesson according to the 5E framework. After 15 minutes, switch over and redesign the other person’s lesson
30:00
Every GSI is operating within different constraints. Start small. Try changing just one thing.
Start your class with something that engages students and elicits prior knowledge. You could combine this with an icebreaker, check in question to keep it casual and make it a routine.
Allow for exploration before you explain or give mini-lectures. Spend time thinking about strategies to get students to collaborate and share their thoughts with others and the class.
Collect some form of assessment (informal is ok!) from your students every class. The middle of the semester is approaching (crazy!), that’s a natural time to send a feedback form.
This class session is adapted from:
Pickett, Sarah and Marisella Rodriguez. (July 7, 2021). What Comes First? How We Can (Re)Order What We Teach to Align with How People Learn. Center for Teaching and Learning, University of California, Berkeley. Campus-wide workshop.